Acting Queer: How Color-Blind Racism is Paralleled In Casting LGBTQ Roles

Earlier this year, at the 2014 Academy Awards, Jared Leto took home the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for his portrayal of the HIV positive transgender character Rayon in Dallas Buyers Club. This was the crowning achievement among widespread critical acclaim for his acting in the role. He was praised for his weight loss, for his never breaking character during filming, and for his ability, as the above video suggests, to make the character “real.”

Leto finished his journey with the character Rayon by taking the opportunity in his acceptance speech to address the “dreamers” of the world and accept the award standing “for and with” those “who have ever felt injustice because of who you are, or who you love.”

However, a problem that went largely overlooked as the accolades and praise came in for Leto was the fact that there is an extreme underrepresentation of Queer characters being portrayed by members of the marginalized group who they are portraying. I think it is a fair assessment to say that the only mainstream Transgendered character actually portrayed by a Transgendered actor is Orange is the New Black’s Sophia Burset, played by Laverne Cox.

While I do not wish to take away from any actors’ talent or ability, I think that there is a problem within casting for Queer characters that is being overlooked which parallels the idea of “Color-Blindness” with respect to race. The idea of Color-Blind Racism is that in an abstract application of liberalism, every person is seen as having equal opportunity regardless of their race. In other words, an overly liberal mindset that racism is over in the United States creates a philosophy of equality that leaves historical injustices with current day ramifications in the past, as well as overlooks discrimination, privilege, and social power struggles to say that we’re all American’s and we’re on an equal playing field. This is not true, because if we stick to the playing field analogy, some Americans are born with the privilege of being on 3rd base and headed for home while others are born at the end of the bench in the dugout with no chance at batting in the foreseeable future.

The way that I believe this mentality is aligning itself with casting choices for LGBTQ characters is by having a mentality of casting “whoever is best for the part.” Which makes sense, and if you’re making a film, you want the best actor. However, the problem is that the Jared Leto’s of the world are being cast, while actual Transgendered actors are being overlooked and kept out of sight within mainstream Hollywood representations of their group. Other mainstream roles are Walton Goggins Transgender character Venus Van Dam on Sons of Anarchy, and Lafayette Reynolds, who was discussed in a previous post. All of these characters are being played by hetero males who are putting on dialects and mannerisms that allow them to fit into a Queer type, allowing audiences and critics can praise them for their “transformational” acting. Essentially, they are putting on what I want to call “Queer Face,” which is reminiscent of old Hollywood habits of dressing white actors in Black face and acting out Black stereotypes as opposed to granting black actors roles.

The recognizable actors like Jared Leto have the privilege of being granted important roles during a time where there is a push for more representation of the LGBTQ communities and moves for social change. They can maybe even use this privilege, as Leto attempted to by standing “for and with” who he was portraying, to try to bring awareness and positive reinforcement to LGBTQ issues. In the end though, for every Jared Leto cast in a Queer role that will be hailed as inspiring and transformational, there are groups of Laverne Cox’s who are being excluded from participating in representation of their own community and issues.

9 Comments

  1. Actually I didn’t notice about this before you’re telling me. This really blows my mind. What a coincidence that I started to watch Orange is the New Black 2 weeks ago! And I found it unbelievable at first to know Laverne Cox is a REAL transgender person, you know, when she finally can talk and dress the way she wants, and maybe when she is telling the story in the movie, she is telling about her own stories! It would be much much real. I agree with you, why do we have to find someone to “pretend as real” instead of have the real ones act real!

    By the way, I love the way you make connections between posts.
    I’ll come back for sure.

    Like

    • Thank you! I think it is a little bit shocking, maybe because it is so refreshing, to know that the show had the intelligence and the respect to cast a Transgender actor. The first time I heard about Laverne Cox I remember feeling the same thing. I think that the “real” aspect they can provide to their characters definately gives the show more credibilty, given that even though they are not the ones writing or directing, the actors can provide the necessary input when the production team is getting something wrong or inaccurate.
      and thank you again, I appreciate your continued reaadership!

      Like

  2. I think that this is so interesting, I chose to write about the same phenomenon, except in terms of people of color. It is mind blowing to see that Hollywood still finds it acceptable to cast characters that do not, or cannot actually represent the characters that they are trying to portray. I definitely agree with all that you said in your post. But on the other hand (devil’s advocate), do you think that there might be a deficit in the amount of transgendered women actors talented enough to play the role? Seeing as the actual representation of queer people in television is relatively new, where do you find a transgender woman with acting talent, like Sophia Burset, or then do you invest the resources to properly train her? These are all cost issues that directors and those who cast films have to think about. How do they get around it?

    Like

    • I appreciate the devil’s advocate you are playing haha. But I would have to say that there are probably many more wondering around hollywood looking for a break than are even being considered. And if there is a lack of actors from the LGBTQ community trying to achieve mainstream success, it may be that there lack of access and exclusion from Hollywood has turned them away toward independent projects or different careers, which is sad, and all the more reason to stop the exclusion if you are in a position to do so, I would say!
      Thank you for the comment!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I adore Laverne Cox. And I agree with you here. Although it’s important to point out that Jared Leto – and others like Eric Stonestreet of “Modern Family” – are fantastic actors, they can’t truly understand where their characters are coming from, and that’s when you get stereotype after stereotype. Great post!

    Like

    • Thank you! I think they are the two biggest names right now executing what I’m talking about here, and therfore some of the most important to focus on and see how they handle their roles. I hope you come back for more next post! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Well spoken. You are so right, and I think the term “Queer Face” accurately summarizes every point you made here. It’s very hard to determine the source of the empirical problem here, but it seems to stem from our very culture, and the paradigms built around it. And even more specifically, our media and our celebrities, and how those two factors interact to shape or impart ideas that become public opinion. Jared Leto is a brilliant actor, an artist, and I believe his acceptance was heartfelt and honest. It is a shame that he has in some ways become a target for blame for the issues you’ve talked about, but he likely knew the consequence of accepting the role. In that way I think he still earns his praise, because despite being an example of Queer Face himself, he willfully took that role, and all the controversy that comes with it, and by playing it so well as to receive an Oscar he has helped bring that issue more into focus. Do I wish it was given to somebody who is actually a really talented transgender actor? Of course! I think we as a culture, and especially those with power in the realm of tv and film production, are at a turning point when it comes to these issues. A lot of production is still run by older generations who didn’t grow up in the same world of acceptance (I’m using the term generously here) that us millennials have. That’s not right. But that sort of cultural conditioning isn’t undone over night. As a target audience, the producers and distributors really are looking at the numbers (some more so than others) and in a way, the responsibility also falls partially us who consume media to demand those changes in how roles are cast. I’ll bet the producers and folks responsible for DBC are kicking themselves in the ass right now because they DIDN’T cast a transgender actor. And if they aren’t, they fucking should be. I really believe that we are at the tipping point, and with more recognition of the brilliant talents of Laverne Cox, and other transgender performers and artists (and recognition that is NOT based on their “differences”, but on their actual talents), that we as a culture will begin to accept our LGBTQ brothers and sisters and stop basing their talents on their sexual identities. Because people have a tendency of making their judgements conditional factors on the outcome of what somebody accomplishes, and that is unfair and insulting to artists who identify themselves as anything other than “straight” and/or “white” and/or “male.”

    Thanks for writing this piece, and for potentially reading my rubbish response. I totally agree with you and hope people start to open their eyes.

    Like

    • This was nicely said! I appreciate you taking the time to read my post and give a well thought response! I beleive the source of the problem is directly what you addressed as far as who is behind the production. Change does not come over night, but as long as the people with the privilege and the power in production are able to recognize the need for more diverse representation then there is real opportunity for change. I think that the key though is understanding what diverse representation really is. It is not just the appearance of diversity, with lots of pretty faces creating a diverse aesthetic with no substance underneath, but it is instead a recognition that different experiences and advantages/disadvantages are all part of the human experience, and that understanding each others differences and alternate experiences makes us all stronger and able to grow with and learn from one another. Nothing gets this off to a better start than allowing for people from marginalized communities to tell their own storeis. Laverne Cox is hopefully the first drop in a pond that has the potential to ripple into more LGBTQ directors, writers, and producers voicing their experiences in the mainstream. That goes for racial and ethnic minorities too, as well as cross sections between all of those identifications. I think in the 90s sort of indie movement in film there were alot of Queer films that intersected with issues of race and gender and class, but they went largely unnoticed and their exposure has been relegated to Ethnic Studies and Sociology courses and in college classrooms. In a perfect world the current momentum would maybe reignite those 90s flames and get more exposure to those stories, as well as open the doors for new ones to break through. Maybe that is an entirely seperate blog post for a different day… stay tuned 🙂

      Like

Leave a comment